IU Bloomington Peer Analysis
Compare Indiana University-Bloomington's educational offerings, employee demographics, and financial insights against peer institutions through interactive visuals for 2020.
Indiana University-Bloomington Comparative Analysis with Selected Consortium Institutions – 2020
The Indiana University-Bloomington Comparative Analysis with Selected Consortium Institutions – 2020 is an interactive Power BI report designed to deliver comprehensive insights into how Indiana University-Bloomington compares to selected consortium peers—Michigan State University and Purdue University-Main Campus—in terms of educational offerings, workforce composition, and detailed financial metrics for the year 2020.
Report Sections:
-
Employee and Educational Offering:
- Compares application fees for undergraduate and graduate programs.
- Highlights differences in educational offerings, including evening classes, childcare availability, military credits, and study abroad opportunities.
- Presents clear employee distribution data distinguishing between full-time, part-time, and medical school employees, along with tenure and occupation statuses.
-
Financial Reports:
- Detailed financial health overview of each institution covering revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, and debts.
- Utilizes visual charts and comprehensive tables for simplifying complex financial data.
- Highlights key financial indicators, such as operating/non-operating revenues, net pension liabilities, and capital asset investments.
-
Grants and Discounts Analysis:
- Breakdown of operating grants and contracts by source, institutional grants, capital gifts, and federal grants.
- Clear illustrations showing each institution’s use of government/private grants and management of student discounts and allowances.
- Insightful visual comparisons helping stakeholders quickly grasp each university's funding structure and financial strategy.
Designed for clarity and ease of navigation, this report is ideal for stakeholders, prospective students, parents, educational analysts, and institutional decision-makers seeking detailed yet easily understandable comparative insights.